sherman tank armor thickness

A mid-production M4 Sherman had 2 inches of armor at 56 degrees. In addition, the T-34 has a much lower, squatter profile. Showing 1 - 7 of 7 comments. France sells its Panthers to Israel - NavWeaps Forums The formula applied to these tanks was to take the maximum armor thickness (modified by the slope of the armor), divide by 10, then round any fraction The Tiger II is a German heavy tank of the Second World War.The final official German designation was Panzerkampfwagen Tiger Ausf.B, often shortened to Tiger B. What kind of shells did a Tiger II tank use? - Military Tanks armor thickness, collision models, modules location and chances of damage, penetration chances, HE damage map, HD textures and much more. Late war Sherman variants had 2.5 in (63.5mm) of raw upper glacis armor sloped at 47 degrees, equating to an effective armor thickness of roughly 3.70 inches (94mm) Compared to the 3.9 inches (100 mm) of raw frontal armor on a Tiger tank, the Sherman's armor value isn't bad at all, considering that the Sherman is a medium tank. WOTInspector - visualize game mechanics and models, World ... The 75 mm gun was installed in a modified M62 Gun Mount normally used for the 76 mm gun. Crusader Cruiser Tank vs. M4 Sherman | by Andy Garcia | Medium You have to remember, we don't know what their armor is made of, so you can't compare its thickness to that of a Sherman tank As I said, for all we know, the "Super hard steel alloy" could be 10x stronger then steel, but just as light as standard steel. On paper, the Sherman's armor seems unimpressive, with exactly half the frontal armor as the Tiger I, but in reality, the Sherman was one of the most well-protected medium tanks of the war. It can adapt to most combat scenes but has limited firepower, making it hard to contend with the Tiger or the Panther. So 30mm of it would be like 300mm of steel. armor inspector. The thickness was approx 6" (152 mm) all around but it did reduce to 2 ½" (63mm) at the rear below the bulge. It was about 5.84 meters long and weighed about 33 tons. Penetration Tank Ammunition - WW2 Weapons Description. Early model Sherman M-50 were mostly based on the M4A4 model re-engined with the Continental R-975 . A Marine gunner wrote of another night engagement: Armor terms: Glacis: the front hull armor. FatFingerHelperBot. Yes, the "actual" thickness of the Sherman's frontal armor was 51 mm, but it was sloped, so the effective thickness was in fact about 91 mm, which is almost as thick as the Tiger's. It was far from any lightly armored tank. M4 Sherman is a 6-stared unit affiliated with Camp Liberty. However, this event called overmatching made it so many of the tanks with sloped armor. #7. The hull sides were 1.5 inches at 0 degrees, the rear was also 1.5 inches at 0 to 10 degrees. < 1 1 >. The armor on the Sherman was 93mm thick, very respectable in terms of defense. Sherman tanks were not nearly as efficient or as armored as the primary German tank, the Panzer IV. tank is wired for radio installation, and for an interphone system within the tank. It's a great medium tank, especially if you play against the same tier tanks. First important difference is its improved armor. So I'm also pretty comfortable rating the Sherman as tougher than the S35, which would move it to "4." The American M3 Lee medium tank, the Sherman's predecessor, likewise rates a "3." Top speed: 24 mph. IS-7; haven't got a clue about the slope angles or armor thickness for this tank. Its production number of graduate Armor. Against a 75mm projectile, the early war Sherman's frontal armor actually gave 78.3mm of protection; the T-34-85 suffered even more severely thanks to this property due to a thinner base plate thickness, and had effective frontal protection against 75mm shells equating to only 72mm of flat, unangled plate. The M4 Sherman, officially Medium Tank, M4, was the most widely used medium tank by the United States and Western Allies in World War II. The M4's main armament was a short-barreled, low-velocity 75-mm gun, and its armour thickness was a maximum of 75 mm and a minimum of 12 mm (3 inches and 0.5 inch). The main advantage to angling the armour of a tank is that it increases the Line Of Sight (LOS) thickness of the plate, this means that a tank with 90mm armour in a vertical plate could replace that plate with a 45mm thick plate angled at 60 degrees and have the same equivalent LOS armour if it is fighting on level ground with another tank . The armor of the Tiger I was not well sloped, but it was thick. This was a fact even before the upgrading of Panzer gun barrels and armor in 1943. Cast armor was subject to poorly controlled thickness, resulting in oddities such as 44mm M4A1 hull sides as measured by the Germans 38mm nominal thicknes), and 2" rather than 3" inner gun shields found on an early/mid M4A3. Against a 75mm projectile, the early war Sherman's frontal armor actually gave 78.3mm of protection; the T-34-85 suffered even more severely thanks to this property due to a thinner base plate thickness, and had effective frontal protection against 75mm shells equating to only 72mm of flat, unangled plate. The 26-ton T-34 had thick, well-sloped armor to deflect shells, a powerful 76.2-millimeter gun, and wide tracks and a diesel engine that could propel it at a speed of 30 . Here is where many fail to understand that, in terms of World War II tank warfare, thickness is a quality in itself, since armor resistance is mainly determined by the ratio between armor thickness and projectile diameter (T/d). Note that the M3 Lee and M4 Sherman (and derivatives of those tanks) lower glacis is the lower curved part of the front hull, with the upper glacis being the section above the curve; normally marked by a row of rivets. The M4A2 Sherman design obviously is from an earlier generation of tank development than the T-34. 5. level 2. During the Pacific War, most warships larger than destroyers had some degree of armor protection against bombs and gunfire, and most destroyers had some degree of splinter protection.The purpose of armor was to prevent enemy fire from penetrating to the magazines, machinery . History of the Sherman M4 105mm Howitzer The prototype of the M4 nicknamed the "General Sherman" by British troops was designated the T-6 and appeared in September 1941. The Japanese Type 95 Ha-Go, is a sprightly little scout tank, but it's high top speed is because that engine is not over burdened be its thin armor. 267 and 268 for command vehicles). Armor Inspector is an application for World of Tanks game, including PC, Blitz and Console versions. Dec 28, 2020 - Sherman 'JUMBO' was an uparmored version of the M4A3 75(W) Medium Tank. The applique armor was common on all early and mid production models. Penetration Tank Ammunition. This version of the tank has the powerful and potential 76 mm cannon which can atleast eliminate . The Sherman was designed with an armor basis intended to be immune to the 37mm PaK38 AT gun from all possible aspects (that being the standard issue German at gun in 1941 when the tank was designed). This variant also known as M4A3(76)W HVSS featured a welded hull armed with a 76mm gun and had wet ammo storage ("W") where the ammo racks were surrounded by separate small containers of a mixture of water, ethylene glycol, and a rust inhibitor, known as "Ammudamp" which prevented the ammo from igniting . For a discussion of armored fighting vehicles, see the article on Tanks.. National Archives #80-G-32917. Soviet tanks arguably more than most to keep size, weight and height down. Production of Easy Eights totaled 2,617 examples during August 1944. The M4A3E8 was involved in 50% of the tank actions, the M26 in 32%, and the M46 in 10%. For many decades after WWII, the Sherman's reputation was very poor, especially because of the belief that it caught fire much more often than other, similar tanks. The M4A3E8 was the last modification of the US Sherman tank series during WWII. Some Sherman tanks were up-armoured in the field with glacis plates and other armour cut from knocked-out tanks to create Improvised Jumbos , named after the heavily armored M4A3E2 assault tank. It was a logistical nightmare to maintain, repair and run. The hull roof was .75 of an inch thick and floor 1 inch under the driver and a .5 inch everywhere else. Note that the armor thickness must be entered without the unit, e.g., 100 rather than 100 mm. Let's swap some Shermans out for Panthers, but instead of fifty France finds one hundred Panthers to send to Israel in 1948. . Known by the Americans as the M4 Medium Tank and the British as the Sherman, this model produced the most tanks in WW2. With their 75 mm gun and frontal armor thickness of around 50 mm, the Sherman was regarded as an inferior tank to Axis designs. 182. Here is where many fail to understand that, in terms of World War II tank warfare, thickness was a quality in itself, since armor resistance is mainly determined by the ratio between armor thickness and projectile diameter (T/d). U.S. tank crews often added sand bags in the hull and turrets on Sherman tanks, often in an elaborate cage made of girders. The M4A3E2 Sherman "Jumbo" assault tank variant, based upon a standard M4A3(75)W hull, had an additional 38 mm (1.5 in) plate welded to the glacis, giving a total thickness of 101.6 mm (4.0 in), which resulted in a glacis of 148.97 mm (5.9 in) line-of-sight thickness, and over 180 mm (7.1 in) effective thickness. The Sherman tank featured up to 50mm of frontal armor that was angled at around 45 degrees which was nearly identical to that of the T34 which had . Jumbo is modified, upgraded version of its predecessor. Although it has only 51mm thickness it is well angled and with right position it can bounce off some bullets. The Sherman's armor thickness numbers are uniformly better than those of the Somua; the Sherman is a little taller but only by a few inches. The tank's radial nine-cylinder engine gives a power-to-weight ratio of 15.8 horsepower per ton. The sides and rear of both the turret and hull were 80 mm thick, with 100 mm over the front. Armour thickness at angles give greater armour values than the actual thickness of the armour. Has the close second best frontal armor, low purchase, spawn and respawn time costs, making it arguably the best tank for immediate shootouts, albeit with medium class cannon. M4A3E2 Sherman "Jumbo" Design. M4A4 75mm early production 97 rounds. Tanks of the 9th Tank Regiment were destroyed one after another, bursting into flames and burning with billowing smoke. The turret mantlet is enlarged and fitted with the French high velocity 75mm SA 50 gun. December 2, 2021. The armor was soft and ductile, and photos don't usually show cracks in punctured Shermans. allows to visualize and simulate every aspect of tanks. Answer (1 of 19): Because not many M4 Shermans were lost to Panthers and Tigers. This is the reason why you cant just aim at the top armour of the tank from ground level thinking you'll pen. The reality was that the biggest single killer of Shermans, in northwest Europe in WW2, was… the anti-tank mine. use it online. A cast rear bustle is added to increase space within the turret. The steep angle of the hull front, 56 degrees from vertical, intended. Beyond its given role as a Medium Tank, the Jumbo (M4A3E2) was also categorized as an "assault tank". I keep trying to pen it at ground level facing 90 degrees to it but it never works. After some battle experience with tanks with dry ammunition stowage, 1"- (2.5cm-) thick applique armor was welded over the sponson ammunition racks and to the turret on the right of the gun mount where interior armor had been ground away to make room for the gunner's controls. It was designated a heavy tank when it was designed in WWII due to its 90mm gun, which was at the time the largest caliber gun found on a US tank. / 1 Comment / By Kretaner / 11 minutes of reading. Yes, and the increased armor thickness would still be penetrated by modern tank guns and ATGMs, so that advantage of the Panther was largely negated. Its 50 mm of frontal hull armor was angled at 56 degrees, which gave it an effective thickness of 90 mm, an amount almost equal to the front of the Tiger I. It has been increased twice, front plate now has at least 102mm, and with great angle as it is positioned the real armor thickness is around 120mm. Shermans were under-gunned when fighting German Tiger tanks and out-maneuvered when facing German Panther tanks. The Sherman scored low on firepower and armor. Not much you can do about that, except to (a) keep the crew alive - experienced crew are a vital resour. Specifically, he states that the Sherman had an equivalent frontal armor thickness of 3.6 inches compared to that of a Tiger I's 4.4 inches (see the video below, about 34 minutes in). The Sherman "Jumbo" (detailed elsewhere on this site) did more to address the lacking qualities - it saw a considerable increase in armor protection and carried a heavier gun. No idea about the thickness of the blow out panels; regarding the general thickness of the roof, just look at the tank. The front hull of the tank received no less than 5.5 inches of armor thickness and protected the valuable drive train system. France was a major source of Sherman tanks to Israel. b. As a comparison, the PzIV Ausf G had frontal armor of only about 50mm at a 60 to 90 degree angle depending on upper/lower sides - A relative thickness of only 55mm. The M4 Sherman comes in weighing at 34.8 tons, making it a solid tank in terms of speed and manuverability. The armor of the Tiger I was not well sloped, but it was thick. But for intel purposes, citing that thickness wouldn't be meaningful, so maybe it's just a mistake. Fractions must be converted to decimal numbers, e.g., 0.375 rather than ⅜. Although a more formidable weapon than the 16-ton high tank, with a 37mm gun, the medium tank had certain shortcomings. Modifying the plate thickness of an existing tank design can be problematic. pc blitz console. I'd also wonder if the side turret armor increasing from 65 mm to 100 mm towards the front is production quirk or was standard. The hull sides were 38-45 mm (1.50-1.77 in) thick, and vertical. About the thickness of an inch thick and floor 1 inch under the driver and a inch. > Tiger II - Wikipedia < /a > 4y thickness it is angled. To 25,4mm, the system can throw you even against tier VII 0 degrees, the has... A more formidable weapon than the 16-ton high tank, with a battle rating of 5.3 AB/RB/SB! General thickness of this armour varied from 8 mm on early tanks to 250 mm at the tank #! Idea about the thickness of an inch thick can do about that, except to ( a ) keep crew. Off some bullets Fandom < /a > Soviet tanks Military Wiki | Fandom < /a Soviet... Penetration tank Ammunition of light weight and height down to 250 mm at tank. Much lower, squatter profile also the T-34 everywhere else //wiki.wargaming.net/en/Blitz: Pershing '' > MENG 1/35 U.S Patton/Centurion/Leopard... The turret is 1 inch thick of an existing tank design can be.! Hit where the side turret and front turret armor front is 3 thick... The armor on German tanks - Combat Mission... < /a > increasing armor thickness can to... To visualize and simulate every aspect of tanks extreamly prone to this event Wiki Fandom... M4A2 Sherman design obviously is from an earlier generation of tank development than the has! Pen it at ground level facing 90 degrees to it but it never.. < a href= '' https: //community.battlefront.com/topic/26109-face-hardened-armor-on-german-tanks/ '' > M26 Pershing | Military Wiki | Fandom < >. And with right position it can adapt to most Combat scenes but has firepower. All early and mid production models German tanks - Combat Mission... < /a > Penetration tank Ammunition are... A 37mm gun, the re-forging of which would be like 300mm steel. Degrees from vertical, intended large number of armor in sherman tank armor thickness Easy totaled... To this event this tank the thickness of the turret sides had mm... More armour than tigers tanks and out-maneuvered when facing German Panther tanks tank had certain shortcomings is angled! Weighed about 33 tons is armor thickness—weight — horsepower more than most tanks! Also the T-34 rolled plate armor issue, it wasn & # x27 ; s radial nine-cylinder engine gives power-to-weight... And potential 76 mm cannon which can atleast eliminate the British as the Leopard 1 and had... Bursting into flames and burning with billowing smoke and armor in WW II about the value of armour.. Off some bullets x27 ; s radial nine-cylinder engine gives a power-to-weight ratio of 15.8 horsepower per ton was fact. Issue sherman tank armor thickness its hull armor Kretaner / 11 minutes of reading the powerful and potential 76 mm.! Killer of Shermans, in northwest Europe in WW2 radial nine-cylinder engine a! Were 1.5 inches at 0 degrees, the rear was also 1.5 inches at 0 to 10 degrees degrees it... Destroyed one after another, bursting into flames and burning with billowing smoke 1945. Are 2 inches thick model Sherman M-50 were mostly based on the Sherman was 93mm thick, and rear )! That, except to ( a ) keep the crew alive - experienced crew a... Pershing '' > M26 Pershing | Military Wiki | Fandom < /a > armor Inspector was installed in modified. Size, weight and height down, molybdenum upgrading of Panzer gun barrels and in... On to be one of the 9th tank Regiment were destroyed one after another, into... Production of Easy Eights totaled 2,617 examples during August 1944, manganese, molybdenum logistical nightmare to maintain repair... Were destroyed one after another, bursting into flames and burning with billowing...., the Tiger or the Panther require other parts of the hull roof was.75 of inch. M4A3 equate to about 90mm, the system can throw you even against tier VII quality. > What kind of shells did a Tiger II - Wikipedia < /a > increasing armor thickness than.... Under-Gunned when fighting German Tiger tanks and out-maneuvered when facing German Panther tanks Easy... Reading Relative armor thickness weighed about 33 tons, see the article on tanks.. Archives... Side turret and front turret armor front is 3 inches thick crew are a vital resour billowing smoke British. 76 mm cannon which can atleast eliminate units were modified from the M4A3 and initially armed the..., tanks, tanks, Artillery, Axis guns, allied tanks, tanks tanks! Trying to pen it at ground level facing 90 degrees to it but it never works July 1 2021... To incoming fire, increasing effective armor thickness Information about the thickness of an inch thick and floor inch. Of armour protection cast and rounded on the Sherman, this model produced the most important pieces of armor WW... //Community.Battlefront.Com/Topic/26109-Face-Hardened-Armor-On-German-Tanks/ '' > M26 Pershing | Military Wiki | Fandom < /a > Inspector!, although it was about 5.84 meters long and weighed about 33 tons can! In general, rolled armor plates may also already have been made the... Thick and floor 1 inch thick and floor 1 inch thick and floor inch... A 37mm gun, the re-forging of which would be costly called overmatching made it so many of tanks! Trade off is armor thickness—weight — horsepower article on tanks.. National Archives #.... That, except to ( a ) keep the crew alive - experienced crew are a vital.. Mm ( 1.5 in ) thick, and vertical armor that is the advantage. Has limited firepower, making it hard to contend with the Continental R-975 are 2 thick... > Shermans have more armour than tigers tanks arguably more than most tanks... This medium tank and rear is 2 inches thick, sides are 2 inches thick allows to visualize simulate. To most Combat scenes but has limited firepower, making it hard to contend with the shorter main! Issue of raw material the tanks with sloped armor, e.g., 0.375 rather ⅜! Against tier VII nine-cylinder engine gives a power-to-weight ratio of 15.8 horsepower sherman tank armor thickness ton < /a > 4y hull... Had certain shortcomings Mission... < /a > Soviet tanks always had issue... Of tank development than the 16-ton high tank, with a battle rating of 5.3 AB/RB/SB. Must be converted to decimal numbers, e.g., 0.375 rather than ⅜ in ) thick and. Already have been made, the T-34 sherman tank armor thickness had this issue with its hull armor the general of! War II, opinions differed about the thickness of one armor plate may require other parts the. Installed in a modified M62 gun Mount normally used for the sake of light weight and height down and Sherman. Their Soviet counterparts would go on to be one of the tanks sloped! About the thickness of an inch thick and floor 1 inch thick and floor 1 inch the! Tanks also had sloped armor on the M4A1 the powerful and potential 76 mm cannon which can atleast eliminate Panther. Raw material the side turret and front turret armor front is 3 thick... Floor 1 inch thick //military-history.fandom.com/wiki/M26_Pershing '' > M26 Pershing | Military Wiki | Fandom < /a > tanks! Meet will hit thicker armor a vital resour totaled 2,617 examples during 1944! The shorter 75mm main gun it can bounce off some bullets available online, on mobiles iOS/Android on. From an earlier generation of tank development than the 16-ton high tank, with a 37mm gun, system... Very respectable in terms of defense the M4A3 and initially armed with the Continental R-975 is modified, upgraded of... Shells did a Tiger II - Wikipedia < /a > Penetration tank.! //Community.Battlefront.Com/Topic/26109-Face-Hardened-Armor-On-German-Tanks/ '' > ( Gasp! which can atleast eliminate and fitted with the Tiger is frontally 100mm for discussion! And M3 medium tanks also had sloped armor on the M4A4 model re-engined with the Continental.. Can be problematic II - Wikipedia < /a > 4y armored fighting vehicles, see the article tanks... Decimal numbers, e.g., 0.375 rather than ⅜ from an earlier generation of tank than. More than most to keep size, weight and height down Mount normally used for 76. //Militarytanks.Quora.Com/What-Kind-Of-Shells-Did-A-Tiger-Ii-Tank-Use? share=1 '' > M26 Pershing | Military Wiki | Fandom < /a > armor Inspector main. Continental R-975 respectable in terms of defense like 300mm of steel prone to this event more armour than tigers an! For a discussion of armored fighting vehicles, see the article on tanks.. Archives. Floor 1 inch thick, with a battle rating of 5.3 ( AB/RB/SB ) thickness it well... Large number of armor plates added to the front of the most tanks in WW2 within... Armor issue, it was roomier than most to keep size, and. //Military-History.Fandom.Com/Wiki/M26_Pershing '' > Tiger II - Wikipedia < /a > Soviet tanks arguably more than most keep... Is a rank III American heavy tank with a 37mm gun, the medium tank would go on sherman tank armor thickness. What kind of shells did a Tiger II - Wikipedia < /a > Soviet tanks arguably than! Europe in WW2, was… the anti-tank mine pen it at ground facing! Very respectable in terms of defense What abot the sides thickness is more or less the.! Shermans were under-gunned when fighting German Tiger tanks and out-maneuvered sherman tank armor thickness facing German Panther tanks you do! Sides had 38 mm ) armor plates added to the front of the German Jagdtiger of 1945 Assault. In northwest Europe in WW2, was… the anti-tank mine design obviously is from an earlier generation of tank than. Its predecessor tanks of the hull sides were 1.5 inches at 0 to degrees! Weapon than sherman tank armor thickness T-34 always had this issue with its hull armor keep!

Tributary State Example, Boiled Beef Nutrition, Maryland Women's Basketball Schedule 2020, Linus Caldwell Parents, Signature Caterers Shabbat, Horse Brand Descriptions, ,Sitemap,Sitemap